Cleveland Clinic - Family Health and Surgery Center Beachwood Beachwood, Oh

You know almost how individuals gain control of the ability of the Land and then abuse that ability like former Us President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Republic of iraq which was highly assisting for some Us businesses.  He accomplished this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush-league UK The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley 15 February 2011.

Think how Bush was supported by UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did not be simply which Blair claimed could be deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If y'all retrieve that and then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade united states of america we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin can save u.s. all if nosotros trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously most how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about every bit a result of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, especially diet and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to accept:

Small Pox – Big Prevarication – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and information technology did impale people long ago.

This was especially the example when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London's kickoff park congenital after rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized Globe.

The middle and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the and then truly "peachy unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the affliction controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, USA, Sweden.

Now you can read a relatively short just well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its part in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doc – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- United kingdom, U.s. & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the affliction dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On any scientific assay of the history and information, crediting smallpox vaccine for the turn down in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the Britain and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester's arroyo also toll far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Tabular array 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Menstruum.	Minor-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-charge per unit per cent. of Cases
Nihon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.ane
British Army (Bharat)	1860-1908	2,753	307	xi.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	ii,909	234	8.0
Thou Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.iii
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	v.i

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either mode with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Regular army, and of the Royal Navy, are non due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would beget an interesting psychical study were nosotros able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would accept soared with a respective result—but on the opposite side."

Tabular array 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Modest-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.l	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	vii,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	thirty	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu flavor and the enthusiastic calls to employ the influenza vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its beginning. Where did the idea of injecting whole or $.25 of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious affliction begin?

Many medical and history books nowadays a elementary tale of the origin of vaccination. Near present the same bones tale of the brilliant observation of a simple state doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year old boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's easily. The male child came downward with a slight fever, but cipher more. Subsequently, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit mild, case of the disease. Zip happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox in one case more; once again, zero. [one]

Edward Jenner's idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the illness.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the archetype Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a elementary and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, especially those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic status while any unsavory aspects almost the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. Information technology begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of good for you people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the exercise of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The thought behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better against the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and identify in the future.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. Only because of the complication and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could merely be afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often assistance protect the individual that was inoculated, merely there was still an estimated 2-5% that died equally a result.[4,5] However, this was an comeback compared to a xx-25% bloodshed rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] Simply, was the divergence in mortality due to inoculation solitary? Or could it have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had improve admission to more nutritious food and a cleaner surround than the bulk of club?

In that location was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 commodity the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse bug, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

Information technology is incontestably similar the plague a contagious disease, what tends to finish the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contamination, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where information technology would not otherwise accept been produced; the identify where it is thus produced becomes a center of contamination, whence information technology spreads not less fatally or widely than information technology would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural style; these centers of contamination are manifestly multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[7]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure information technology was enthusiastically connected by virtually of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread past this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect i from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-yr-old male child named James Phipps. He took disease affair that he believed to exist cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox equally a examination to see if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the male child did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results challenge lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to back up his contention. While he promoted the utilise of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, in that location were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Doc-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practise.

Merely he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning in that location were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were and so tested by existence inoculated with smallpox to run across if the cowpox process had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results because they were non in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was rapidly embraced past many in the medical profession every bit the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs connected to embrace Jenner's ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the yr 1799. A month afterwards it was inoculated with small-pox thing without event, and a few months afterwards took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-retainer to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless pocket-sized-pox, and died. 3 and four. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted modest-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of pocket-size-pox in Oct 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The kid of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'due south office . . . died of small-pox a year after vaccination.[x]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its hope to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[xi] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an eighteen% fatality charge per unit and is essentially the same fatality rate as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality charge per unit along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering nether Small Pox, who accept previously undergone Vaccination by the almost practiced practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no 1 in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine do." But after vaccinating ane,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His feel was that, after vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it as a new form of income. It is therefore quite meaning for a doctor to have spoken out against it as Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, one, and, two [1820-1822] there was a not bad hubbub almost the pocket-size-pox. It bankrupt out with the nifty epidemic to the due north . . . Information technology pressed close to dwelling to Dr. Jenner himself . . . Information technology attacked many who had had small-pox before, and oftentimes severely; almost to expiry; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, but fell upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote well-nigh the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real small-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine textile was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and in that location were calls to obtain fresh material straight from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine fabric came from cows, Jenner actually believed the textile originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was only smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow fabricated into a new illness.[eighteen] This faulty belief would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a human who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a moo-cow'south udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[xix] A later inquiry determined that this was zilch more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[xx]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, only at that place were also reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For instance, a skin condition called erysipelas was a especially prolonged and painful manner to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, anile v years, "minor-pox confluent, unmodified (ix days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "pocket-sized-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; ii good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, anile x weeks, and the son of a carbohydrate bakery, aged 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas afterwards vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

Beginning I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and at present I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I exercise this very reluctantly. Now I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what information technology was promised to be, refusals increased. In guild to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did zippo to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. After 1855, there were farther smallpox epidemics in 1859-threescore, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no upshot at all (Graph i). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the xx years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this bespeak, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection confronting smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were fabricated that vaccination fabricated smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were and so made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every x years.[25]

While the bulk of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent doc of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were existence made by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the strength of law created the perfect surroundings that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators take received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get almost a quarter million. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. All the same, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A neat pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, fifty-fifty those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three yard four hundred and sixty-9 cases of small-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of ix thousand three hundred and ninety-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, 6 thousand eight hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and 1-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than one hundred and twenty-two thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from modest-pox . . . Official returns from Deutschland evidence that betwixt 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from pocket-size-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine rubber, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal freedom and liberty through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accustomed imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the great sit-in in Leicester England, in 1885. That aforementioned year Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail fourth dimension, was replaced with a new authorities that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a inexpensive and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. Nevertheless, in that location were dire predictions from the bulk of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would upshot in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the bulk of the town's residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was not necessary to command smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall subtract in smallpox deaths (Graph two). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed equally the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a meg, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a catamenia of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when 90-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was oftentimes promoted as a safe procedure, information technology often caused sickness or fifty-fifty death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than ane,600 in England (Graph iii). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the aforementioned (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales full deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph four: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its grapheme. Afterwards the summer of 1897, the astringent type of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and later to as depression as 1 in 380. The disease could yet kill, just having become so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very balmy blazon of smallpox began to prevail in the S and later gradually spread over the land. The bloodshed was very depression and it [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Periodical of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death charge per unit was around 20%, as information technology had been historically. The table too showed that later on 1896 the death rate fell off rapidly, starting with vi% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% past 1908. As the mild grade of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be hard to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a small communicable disease of childhood, and is importantly important because it oftentimes gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the way of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the class of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major outcome, the practise of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the terminal smallpox decease in the United States in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated five,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of ix children in which 2 died of a peel condition due to vaccination, at present being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated past the authors to exist between 1 in 20,000 to ane in 100,000 with a fatality charge per unit of 4 to 40%.[35] However, they best-selling that most cases were non reported and there was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. There were besides an estimated 200 to 300 deaths equally the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had only been 1 smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, just since that time at that place have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, equally recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his armed forces father after the father was vaccinated. Afterwards a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor claret and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother besides required treatment and virus was plant all over the business firm.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 written report idea that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could really have been even higher. This written report only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the Usa. If the deaths were this high in a country with a mod wellness-care arrangement, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the nowadays across the entire world?

At that place were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put united states in the incorrect. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination dice a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to need an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this fourth dimension with vaccination as nearly the just medically promoted fashion to bargain with disease, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common nutrient product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, Yard.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the utilise of Acerb acrid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to pocket-size pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in handling regarding vinegar more than reliable as a prophylactic in pocket-sized-pox than Belladonna in red fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the ill and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, later breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the affliction at all. None who adopted the safety treatment died, while among those under ordinary handling the mortality was every bit usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take intendance of other people with smallpox without fearfulness of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective confronting smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Once again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should exist used 3 or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Guild, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the groovy men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Whatever person who has been exposed need have no fearfulness of smallpox if he will accept 2 or iii tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or 4 times a 24-hour interval." The discussion may now be regarded every bit airtight, and smallpox at final is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem light-headed, but only because most people have been conditioned to accept the age-former prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected creature'due south (unremarkably a moo-cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human being arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the germination of salubrious collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and besides gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar belongings cells together and, as a issue, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of Rex'southward College, described the poor diet of aureate miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, difficult days nether the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, every bit living near entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of stiff coffee, and big quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, nether a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same fourth dimension subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in boxing.[44] For case, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers cached at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy direct accounted for at to the lowest degree two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next mutual cause of expiry, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for just a minor fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died equally a upshot of their wounds accounted just for i percent of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such equally scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known equally pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered balmy childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive reject of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & half dozen).

Graph v: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a land md making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical conventionalities that continues to be echoed past indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. Just the true history shows us a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche every bit something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific illness. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'south keen discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more than vaccines seem similar a expert thought to you?

More than data on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping coughing, and lost remedies can exist institute in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which tin exist found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
ii.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Affliction and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford Academy Press, 2007, p.179.
vii."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard'southward Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
ten.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What information technology Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
xi."Vaccination past Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. 8, July-Dec, 1817, p. 95.
xiii.Mr. Thomas Dark-brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
xvi.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present Land of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, Apr 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the Country of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, Feb 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Minor-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Picket, April 1911, vol. 19, no. iv, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. West. Harman, MD, "A Md's Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June i, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to exist Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Non past the Propagation of Illness," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. W. Hodge, Dr., "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. Iii, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. ii, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the do of preventive medicine, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Toll Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos Dr., Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Correct to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, Academy of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. ten.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acid in Blood-red Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Periodical of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Scientific discipline, vol. one, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, Jan 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. VI, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January four to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed nether: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safe, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Wellness, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines |

glasskitn1955.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post